In finance, “the AI decided” is not an acceptable record.
Financial operations already run on limits, dual control and evidence. An agent that bypasses them is unusable, whatever its accuracy. AEGIS is designed to carry those controls into autonomous work.
AEGIS has no regulatory certification and is not a compliance product. Nothing on this page is legal or regulatory advice. Regulated firms must assess any system against their own obligations.
Set the line
Limits should be policy, not hope.
| Synthetic invoice | Vendor | Amount | Guard decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| INV-1041 | Alder Packaging | $3,240.00 | Allow |
| INV-1042 | Brightline Logistics | $18,600.00 | Require approval |
| INV-1043 | Corvane Industrial | $7,450.00 | Require approval |
| INV-1044 | Dunmore Supplies | $1,980.00 | Allow |
| INV-1048 | Holt & Marsh | $2,750.00 | Deny |
Unattended $5,220.00. Needs a person $26,050.00. Denied $2,750.00, at any limit, because the vendor is not in the approved master. Simulated.
Controls
Familiar controls, applied to agents.
Authorization limits
Amount limits are part of the Mandate and are enforced outside the model.
Dual control
The person who requested the work cannot approve it, and multi-step approvals are planned for Enterprise.
Evidence with approvals
Approvers see the exact parameters and the verification results behind them.
Exception handling
Changed bank details or PO variances hold a payment for review. They are not resolved by a model.
Audit trail
A tamper-evident record links each action to a decision, rule and person.
Unknown outcomes
If a payment instruction may or may not have gone through, the step stops for reconciliation rather than retrying.
Example patterns
Where agents could help first.
| Pattern | Agents prepare | People decide |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable | Matching, verification, payment proposals | Above-limit payments, vendor changes |
| Reconciliation | Matching ledgers, classifying breaks | Write-offs and adjustments |
| Onboarding checks | Collecting documents, flagging gaps | The final decision to accept |
| Disputes | Assembling evidence, drafting a response | Refunds above a limit |
| Reporting preparation | Gathering data, drafting commentary | Review and sign-off |
Where we are
Fintech first. Banks later.
A pre-release platform is not ready for a regulated bank's vendor risk process. We expect to work first with fintech and finance-operations teams, on non-production data, and to earn the evidence needed for anything more.
See it run
The demo uses this exact scenario.
Eight synthetic invoices, one unlisted vendor, one recent bank change, one PO variance.
Working on finance agents?
We would like to understand your control requirements before they are designed in.